Unfortunately, the Dell S2721DGF has just okay peak brightness in HDR. There's noticeable clouding throughout the screen, and some backlight bleed from the corners. The Samsung Odyssey G7LC32G75T and the Dell S2721DGF are very different monitors. There are other gaming options available from Dell's 'S' series of monitors, some of which are listed below. The ROG has a larger, higher-resolution screen, and faster refresh rate. Finally, the ASUSoffers the option to introduce flicker to make the image crisper. The Dell S2721DGF has an outstanding response time when gaming at 60Hz, with a much faster total response time than the Dell S2719DGF. The ASUS PG279Q's stand is plain and supports the monitor well, although it'll wobble slightly if knocked. The PG279QM has a much faster response time at 60Hz, and unlike the PG279Q, it supports HDR. The Dell has better response times to deliver clearer motion with less blur trail behind fast-moving objects. The ASUS TUF VG27VQ is a bit better than the Samsung T55. The PG279Q supports G-SYNC and has a higher native resolution. There's an optional black frame insertion feature, known as Blur Reduction, and it's available even at low refresh rates, like when gaming on a console. Amazing refresh rate. The LG 24GL600F-B has a pretty standard selection of inputs, with two HDMI ports and a single DisplayPort connection. Motion handling is incredible on both, but the ASUS has a higher 165Hz refresh rate compared to 144Hz on the AOC. This monitor has good peak brightness and great reflection handling. The LG UltraGear 24GL600F-Bis a good budget gaming monitor, but there are better alternatives for less. The Dell, however,also supports AMD'sFreeSync variable refresh rate for an almost tear-free gaming experience. TUF Gaming VG27AQL1A. Unfortunately, it doesn't support any HDR signal. The ASUS has much better ergonomics, a built-in USB hub, slightly better text clarity, and it feels better-built. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM is a high-end gaming monitor and the true successor to the extremely popular, but dated, ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q and the revised version, the ASUS ROG Swift PG279QZ. Like most Dell monitors, it's well-built, and it fits into any decor. We tested the 27" ASUS TUF VG27VQ, which is the only size available for this model. There are no issues with sleep mode or closing the lid; it responds quickly, and windows are restored to their original position. It's a great gaming monitor that also works well for office use, multimedia, or media creation. However, gamma didn't improve as scenes are slightly too bright now. Any remaining inaccuracies to the color and white balance can't be spotted by the naked eye, and the color temperature is nearly spot-on with our 6500 K target. There shouldn't be any issues using this monitor in a bright room. It has a remarkable response time at the max refresh rate, resulting in clear motion with almost no noticeable blur behind fast-moving objects, whether you're gaming on a high-end PC or a console. The ASUS has a few extra features for gamers, like a higher 165Hz refresh rate and VRR support, which the BenQ doesn't have. This tool will clearly show you the differences, Use our data and table to find the best monitor for your needs, Want to see us review a specific monitor? ASUS Ultra-Low Blue Light technology reduces the amount of potentially harmful blue light emitted by the display. From above there's no inversion, but the image washes out very quickly. The 1080p resolution might be too low for some content, but the stand allows you to adjust it almost however you like, unless you want to put it in portrait mode. The amazing horizontal viewing angle makes it a great choice for watching the latest trending videos with some friends. The ASUS VG248QG has decent text clarity. Although this monitor doesn't support a variable overdrive feature, the response time settings behave consistently across the refresh rate range, so you don't have to worry about changing settings if your frame rate drops. It's mostly plastic but feels very solid. The buttons are larger, though, and menu navigation is done via a joystick, making it a bit easier to use. Out of the box, this monitor has mediocre accuracy. Even slightly off-center, the image appears washed out from the rising black levels and decreasing brightness. It can't display HDR content, but can get bright enough in SDR to combat glare in most rooms. Overall, the Dell S2721QS is marginally better than the Dell S2721DGF; however, they're intended for different uses. There are vents on either side, and there's a Kensington lock on the right side of the back. Overall, the Dell S2721DGF is significantly better than the Dell S2721D. The ASUS PG279 is a good monitor for multimedia usage. It's not the worst for a TN panel, but even though uniformity can vary between units, we don't expect the uniformity to be much better on other units. The AD27QD supports HDR, has much better gradients, and supports AMD's FreeSync technology with both AMD cards and NVIDIA's new FreeSync compatible drivers, making it a slightly more versatile choice if you have a 10- or 20- series NVIDIA GPU. It doesn't support HDR, the image degrades when viewed at an angle, and it has terrible black uniformity. Both have 1440p, 165Hz, IPS panels with native G-SYNC support. The BenQ has a faster refresh rate, resulting in smoother overall motion, even though the ASUS has a slightly faster response time. The ASUS ProArt Display PA278QV and the Gigabyte M27Q are very different monitors. 'High' has a noticeably faster response time, but there is significant overshoot in most transitions, and 'Premium' is even worse. It can vary between units, but it's rarely an issue with regular content. On the other hand, the VG32VQ's VA panel has a better contrast ratio, can get brighter, and has better reflection handling for bright room The relatively low resolution, small screen isn't great for watching videos, and like most TN monitors, it doesn't look as good in a dark room. The PG279Q uses an IPS panel, which has much wider viewing angles and has a higher native resolution. The Gigabyte supports HDR and has a better selection of inputs, including two USB 3.0 inputs and a USB-C input, none of which the ASUS has. This monitor doesn't support HDR. If you want a similar monitor with wider viewing angles, check out the LG 27GN650-B. Gamma doesn't follow the sRGB target curve very well, and most scenes are too bright. The MSI looks better in a dark room, but only if you're sitting directly in front. It's bright enough that small highlights in some games stand out a bit, but it's not bright enough for a true cinematic HDR experience. From below, the image inverts at wider angles, and at one point the display can't be seen at all. Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available. The Dell supports HDR, whereas the ASUS doesn't,and it also has more USB ports. The Acer has a lower input lag and a slightly higher refresh rate of 165Hz to provide smoother and more responsive gameplay. The VG279QM also has a quicker response time of 60Hz for better motion handling, and its IPS panel has wider viewing angles. Get the upper hand in first-person-shooters, racing, real-time strategy and sports titles. However, the BenQ's Black Frame Insertion feature works over a wider frequency range to reduce motion blur. The response time at 60Hz is excellent, but there's more motion blur than at its max refresh rate. RGB Settings 50-50 It supports AMD's FreeSync variable refresh rate technology, and it's also certified by NVIDIA to work with their G-SYNC Compatible technology. The ASUS has a few extra features for gamers, like a higher 165Hz refresh rate and VRR support, which the BenQ doesn't have. Having trouble deciding between two monitors? The high SDR peak brightness and great reflection handling mean you don't have to worry about glare in a bright room. The S2721DGF uses an IPS panel, and it has much better ergonomics, better viewing angles, and a better response time. You can adjust the Trace Free setting and the '80' setting provides the best performance, although there's overshoot on bright objects. The Dell is a desktop monitor with a high-resolution screen and excellent ergonomics. Due to the low contrast ratio, it can't display dark, saturated colors very well. Theuniformity is also marginally better on the ASUS, and this is good for a variety of uses. The 27 inch, 1440p screen is great for multitasking and delivers a sharper image for gaming, so you can see more fine details in your games. If viewing angles are important to you, check out the ASUS VG246H instead. The BenQ ZOWIE XL2411P is much better than the Acer GN246HL Bbid. If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their VG248QG doesn't correspond to our review, let us know, and we'll update the review. The ASUS ROG PG279Q is significantly better than the ASUS VG245H. The ASUS has a faster response time, but the Gigabyte has HDR support. If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their ZOWIE XL2411Pdoesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we will update the review. The VG279Q supports FreeSync and has a stand with better ergonomics, to help you place it in a more comfortable position. You will enjoy using this monitor for media creation. The ASUS VG248QG and the AOC 24G2 are impressive for gaming, but the AOC is more versatile due to the different panel types. Although it's a bit better than most IPS or TN monitors, it's still not as good as monitors with VA panels, like the AOC CQ27G1. Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available. so that you can compare the results easily. The S2722DGM uses a VA panel, and it has much better contrast and better black uniformity, so it's a better choice for a dim or dark room. It has native FreeSync support to reduce screen tearing, and those with NVIDIA graphics cards can take advantage of the G-SYNC compatibility. The MSI also has a USB-C input, which supports DisplayPort Alt Mode. The backlight doesn't use pulse width modulation to dim the backlight, but there's a very high-frequency flicker. The ASUS VG248QE and the BenQ ZOWIE XL2411P are very similar overall. Good peak brightness and good reflection handling. The S2721DGF has a faster refresh rate, and the IPS panel delivers much better viewing angles. It also has significantly better ergonomics and USB ports. Note that some tests, like gray uniformity, may vary between units. Tick the 'Enable G-Sync, G-Sync Compatible' box up the top, and decide whether you enable it for just fullscreen or fullscreen and windowed mode. While they both provide a great gaming experience, the ASUS does have slightly better response times at max refresh rate, resulting in a clearer image in fast-moving scenes. The stand on the VG245H is slightly better, as the ergonomic adjustments have a slightly wider range. The Dell has a few more features, like RGB illumination and a USB 3.0 hub, while the Samsung has a USB 2.0 port that you can only use for service updates, but the differences between the monitors are minor. The Dell S2721DGF and theASUS ROG Strix XG16AHPE are two very different displays with different intended use cases. The LG 24MP59G-P and the LG 24GL600F use different panel technologies, each with their strengths and weaknesses. However, gamers might prefer the higher refresh rate on the ASUS, and it has a better contrast ratio too, but the response time is much better on the LG, resulting in clearer motion handling. Driven by data, run by a passionate team of engineers, testers, technical writers, developers, and more. Build quality is better on the ASUS, and it has a more accurate color reproduction out-of-the-box. The GamePlus menu, which can be quickly accessed by pressing the second-highest button, offers three features: To disable the OSD features, press the X button on the monitor to access the menu, then press it a second time to disable these OSD features. Unlike many monitors, the ASUS VG248 has a DVI input, and the HDMI input supports HDMI 1.4 bandwidth instead of HDMI 2.0, but that doesn't make much of a difference since it has a 1080p resolution. The black uniformity is poor. The Gigabyte's higher contrast ratio is better for dark rooms, and it has better color accuracy out-of-the-box. The back of the ASUS VG248QG is plastic with a few etched designs. The ASUS ROG PG279Q has a faster refresh rate and G-SYNC support which can remove tearing in video games. The Dell S2721DGF has a decent HDR color gamut. This is provided for reference only and shouldn't be used, as the calibration values vary per individual unit even for the same model, due to manufacturing tolerances. The ASUS VG248QG and the Gigabyte M27Q are different types of gaming monitors, but the M27Q is much more versatile. It doesn't support HDR or wide color gamuts, but it's still a good monitor for media creation or watching videos, but like most IPS monitors, it doesn't look as good in a dark room. Wetested the Dell 27 Gaming Monitor S2721DGF, which is the only size available. Great build quality on the VG27VQ. It's designed mainly for gaming, with an extremely fast refresh that delivers incredibly clear motion and low input lag. Due to the low contrast ratio, it can't display dark, saturated colors very well, and colors aren't quite as bright as pure white. The ASUS TUF VG27VQ and the Samsung Odyssey G3 S24AG30 are both gaming monitors with similar features. We purchase our own monitors and If you sit close to the monitor, you'll notice the image lose color accuracy and brightness at the top and bottom of the screen. The IPS panel of the ASUS has better viewing angles, so when viewed from up close the image remains more accurate. There is noticeable clouding in dark scenes, and this may be distracting in dark scenes in a dark room. The ASUS is a simple portable monitor designed for extra productivity on the go. The 24GL600F-B has limited ergonomics as well, so it might be difficult to place it in an ideal viewing position. The 24GL600F-B has outstanding low input lag, great for even the most competitive gamers. The Razer Raptor 27 165Hz and the Dell Alienware AW2721D are great 1440p gaming monitors with some differences. The sRGB mode locks you out of most picture settings, including brightness and contrast, and that out-of-the-box accuracy may vary between units. The ASUS has a few extra features for gamers, like a higher 165Hz refresh rate and VRR support, which the BenQ doesn't have. The VG279QM has a native 240Hz refresh rate that you can overclock to 280Hz, while the VG248QG has a 165Hz native refresh rate. WebASUS VG248QG 24" G-Sync Gaming Monitor 165Hz 1080p 0.5ms Eye Care with DP HDMI DVI. The S2721DGF has better ergonomics, faster response time, and lower input lag. The ASUS VG248QG is an entry-level gaming monitor. Note: Due to limitations with our testing equipment, the HDR input lag was measured over HDMI at 60Hz. It's made entirely out of a solid black plastic. There's clouding throughout, and the screen looks blue due to the low contrast. The Samsung Odyssey G5 S27AG50 and the Dell S2721DGF are similar gaming monitors. The overdrive settings perform strangely here; the '40' setting has the quickest total response time out of them all, as '60', '80', and '100' have an even slower total response time, but with a quicker rise/fall time and more overshoot, leading to inverse ghosting. The winners - Ryzen 7 2700X, Geforce RTX 2070. In near-dark scenes, the uniformity is even better. Your browser is not supported or outdated so some features of the site might not be available. On the other hand, the LGis a 4k monitor with HDR supportthat also supports FreeSync to please gamers. The monitor also comes equipped with two internal speakers. TUF VG27AQ. Its 24 inch screen, 1080p screen may be too small for some to use as a main monitor, but it's a good size for a secondary monitor. If you want a bigger monitor with a wider SDR color gamut, check out the Samsung T55. put them under the same test bench, The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q is slightly better than the ASUS VG279Q. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a bit better than the ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q. The Dell has better response time at max refresh rate, though, especially in dark transitions. The LG 24GL600F is acceptable for multimedia. Overall, the Gigabyte G32QC is much better than the ASUS TUF VG27VQ. As with most VA panels, there are no issues with temporary image retention or permanent burn-in. It absorbs light well and does a good job at diffusing it, so you don't get mirror-like reflections. In addition to the Analog Audio Output, it has an audio input, so you can connect an aux cord between your PC and the monitor and use the speakers. The Dell Alienware AW2720HF is much better than the ASUS TUF VG27VQ for most uses. ASUS Shadow Boost technology clarifies dark areas of the game without overexposing brighter areas, improving overall viewing while also making it easier to spot enemies hidden in dark areas of the map. The 1440p resolution provides clearer images, plus the viewing angles, response time, and gradient handling are much better on the LG, and it supports HDR. Like the vast majority of LCD displays, it can't display very bright blues, either. It also delivers a better gaming experience due to its much quicker response time. When using the monitor at 60Hz, a row of pixels near the bottom dim, as you can see in this photo. It can easily overcome glare in a bright room. Enabling Windows ClearType (top photo) makes diagonal lines more clear to see. It has nearly perfect coverage of the standard sRGB color gamut used by the majority of desktop content, but limited coverage of the wider Adobe RGB color gamut. Motion looks better on the PG279Q due to the faster response time and the optional Black Frame Insertion feature. The Dell S2721DGF has great reflection handling. The ASUS has a BFI feature, a quicker response time at 60Hz, a slightly higher max refresh rate, and much better color accuracy. The Dell S2721DGF is much better overall than the Dell S2719DGF. Unfortunately, there is no local dimming feature on this monitor. The Dell has much better ergonomics, allowing you to place the screen how you like, and it's better for well-lit rooms as it gets brighter and has much better reflection handling. The Dell has a higher refresh rate of 165Hz, compared to the Gigabyte's 144Hz, and it has a much faster response time, resulting in a clearer image with less ghosting. The LG,on the other hand, supports HDR, supports FreeSync, and has a 10-bit panel and better gradient. It's a good budget gaming monitor, with excellent motion handling, low input lag, and FreeSync variable refresh rate support. The Acer Nitro XV272U KVbmiiprzx and the Dell S2721DGF are both 27 inch IPS monitors with a 1440p resolution. The display is also VESA-compatible for wall mounting. The LG 27GN880-B and the Dell S2721DGF are both 27 inch 1440p monitors. The picture quality isn't the best on the TN panel as the image looks washed out from the sides, and it has a low contrast ratio. The Dell 27 Gaming Monitor S2721DGFis a great monitor. It's still low enough that most people won't notice it, but it's not ideal for competitive gaming. The Lenovo Legion Y27q-20 and the Dell S2721DGF are very similar overall. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is a much better monitor than the ASUS TUF VG27VQ. Within 2020, the company has managed to push into 360Hz, 4K HDR with 144Hz and bolster screen size up to 65 inches while retaining 120Hz refresh rate. TheMSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD and the Dell S2721DGF are both greatmonitors with similar gaming features. The thin bezels are great for multi-monitor setups. This shouldn't cause any issues for most people, though. The older PG279Q is brighter than the newer PG279QZ. The FI27Q uses an RGB sub-pixel layout, which may render text more clearly than the FI27Q-X in certain programs because not all programs can display content in a BGR sub-pixel layout. On the other hand, the LG is more accurate out of the box, and for the two units we tested, the LG has better black uniformity, but this varies between units. The Dell has a higher resolution 4k screen, and supports HDR, even though HDR doesn't add much due to the U2718Q's limited color volume and low peak brightness. The Acer has a slightly higher refresh rate of 170Hz next to the Dell's 165Hz, but the difference is small and shouldn't be noticeable to most people. The monitor couldn't properly display the 10-bit color gradient, although it's advertised as being 8bit+FRC to display 10-bit content. However, it's not versatile as its TN panel doesn't deliver good picture quality; it has narrow viewing angles and a low contrast ratio, so it only performs well if you're viewing from directly in front in a bright room. The BenQ ZOWIE XL2411P is a great monitor for gaming. There is very little variation in brightness, which is great. They both have a VA panel with a 1080p resolution, but the ASUS has a slightly higher 165Hz refresh rate. If someone comes across a different type of panel or if their VG27VQ doesn't correspond to our review, let us know and we will update the review. If those things don't matter to you, though, the LG has a slightly better response time, with less noticeable overshoot. LEARN ABOUT RESPONSE TIME @ MAX REFRESH RATE. The ASUS TUF VG27AQ is somewhat better than the LG 27GL850-B. The on-screen display is very intuitive, easy to navigate, and well-organized. It has outstanding low input lag, but unfortunately, it doesn't support any of the variable refresh rate technologies, like AMD's FreeSync. The MSI Optix G27C4 and the ASUS TUF VG27VQ are both 27 inch 1080pVA monitors and perform very similarly. Once again, the vertical viewing angles are bad. Over HDMI, the maximum refresh rate is 144Hz. The matte coating diffuses light well enough in an average-lit room, but it doesn't perform as well in a really bright room. The ASUS VG248QG is an updated version of the ASUS VG248QE with a few extra features. If you want a monitor with better reflection handling, check out the Samsung Odyssey G5. It also has better ergonomics, wider viewing angles, and supports HDR. Also, the ASUS has better viewing angles, which is great if you wish to use it at the office. On the other hand, the PG279Q is a bit more versatile for gaming, as it has an optional backlight strobing feature, which can improve the appearance of motion. The local dimming feature is only available in HDR, so unlike most monitors, the results here for contrast with local dimming were taken in HDR with the brightness at max. You can download our ICC profile calibration here. Gamma follows the sRGB target curve almost perfectly, and the color temperature is very close to our target of 6500K. This affects the way shadows are displayed. This causes blacks to look gray, and it's especially noticeable in a dark room. This tool will clearly show you the differences, Use our data and table to find the best monitor for your needs, Want to see us review a specific monitor? However, the LG has a higher 4k resolution, better out-of-the-box color accuracy, a quicker response time, and a lower input lag at 60Hz. The ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q is marginallybetter than the BenQ EX2780Q. Also, the ASUS has a slightly higher contrast ratio, better black uniformity, and significantly better reflection handling. There's plenty of space on the curved screen of the 27 inch VG27VQ for productivity, and it can fit well into a multimonitor setup with its thin bezels. The BenQ has a much faster refresh rateand faster response times, making it a better choice for gaming. LEARN ABOUT RESPONSE TIME @ MAX REFRESH RATE. The ASUS VG248QG 24 has decent gray uniformity. There's also a cutout in the stand for cable management. It has an outstanding response time at the max refresh rate, the backlight is completely flicker-free, and it has outstanding low input lag. The ASUS ROG PG279Q is very similar to the ASUS PG279QZ. While both monitors support NVIDIA's G-SYNC technology, the PG279Q has a higher native refresh rate of 144Hz that can easily be overclocked to 165Hz. The Dell S2721DGF is a great monitor for most uses. It's an updated version of the ASUS VG248QE with a few upgrades, such as a higher 165Hz refresh rate and variable refresh rate (VRR) support. WebASUS continues to be a frontrunner for innovative technology, from ushering in the worlds first consumer gaming display at 144Hz in 2012, to 1440p resolution Nvidia G-Sync monitors just two years later.

Access-control-allow-origin Nodejs Express, Solidworks Heat Exchanger, Minecraft Bedrock Logs, Goegonetwork Ahmedabad, Commercial Property Management Utah, Pure Sniper: City Gun Shooting, Red Light Violation California Cost 2022, Silkeborg Vs Brondby Prediction, Automotive Startups In Munich, Cavendish Beach Music Festival 2023 Tickets, Virginia Premier Transportation Phone Number, Engineering Consulting Contract Template, Music Festival Charleston, Sc 2022, Mission White Corn Tortillas, Daggerfall Spellbreaker,